Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Imazapyr: Frill Treatments, Cut Stump Application, Hack and Squirt

From: Comments THP 1-14-148MEN, application of herbicide.

Herbicide applications alter the forest ecosystem on all trophic levels. On the microbial level, growth and function are dramatically diminished after herbicide applications. Both the essential bacteria which fix nitrogen in soil, and the micorrhizal fungi which facilitate nutrient uptake by a plant's root system are inhibited by most herbicides. Bacteria and fungi have similar metabolic functions to higher plants, and so are affected by herbicides in similar ways.

After an herbicide application, the early successional plant species which prevent erosion and nutrient leaching from soil die. Loss of their stabilizing root structure leads to an increase in water movement through the soil, increased nutrient loss, and increased erosion from the spray site. In fact, soil nutrient loss from forest areas treated with herbicides has been shown to be greater than loss after either clearcutting or clearcutting followed by burning. The effect of herbicide treatments on soil quality and nutrient uptake by plants is compounded by the persistence of certain herbicides in soil. The half life of the herbicide imazapyr in soil is calculated as 49.5 months,

MRC should consider the news from San Francisco January 12, 2014:
Under the Natural Areas Program, UCSF, which owns and manages most of Mt Sutro Forest, recently decided not to use pesticides there. This may make it the only wild land in San Francisco that is reliably free of pesticides.
http://sutroforest.com/2013/12/12/ucsf-no-pesticides-for-mount-sutro-forest/


IMAZAPYR
"Classified as a Tier II (More Hazardous) chemical by the San Francisco Department of the Environment, this is another pesticide used mainly by NAP. In 2013, NAP accounted for 97% of the imazapyr used by SFRPD. NAP started using Imazapyr even before the SF DoE had approved its use. The main issues with it are that plants push it out through their root system, so that it can spread and affect other plants; it is very persistent. Its breakdown product is a neurotoxin."

According to a BASF Safety Data Sheet from Europe, it’s Harmful to aquatic organisms, may cause long-term adverse effects in the aquatic environment.” However, a BASF Material Safety Data Sheet from the US says, “There is a high probability that the product is not acutely harmful to fish. There is a high probability that the product is not acutely harmful to aquatic invertebrates. Acutely harmful for aquatic plants.”

Imazapyr is sold under the brand name of “Habitat” when it’s for Native Plant Restoration. Its other trade names are slightly less benign: Chopper. Stalker. Arsenal. Assault.

The 2005 Jackson Demonstration State Forest management plan states: Imazapyr is sold under the trade names of Chopper or Arsenal in California.

This product can be applied by air, but primarily is applied by low-volume hand-held spray equipment as a foliar, basal stem treatment, cut stump treatment, tree injection, or frill. It controls plant growth by preventing the synthesis of amino acids. Action is slower than some other herbicides and can take several months or longer. Imazapyr can remain active in the soil for 6 months to 2 years. It is strongly adsorbed in soil and usually found only in the top few inches. Imazapyr is degraded in soils primarily by microbial action. It is soluble in water. It has a low potential for leaching into ground water. Like other herbicides the potential for movement into streams via stormflow can be reduced by utilizing a no-application streamside management zone.

The half-life of imazapyr in water is about 4 days (SERA, 1999b).

Imazapyr is practically nontoxic to fish and invertebrates (Table 1, Ecotoxicological Categories). EPA has approved an aquatic label in some states. Imazapyr is not expected to accumulate or build up in aquatic animals (I.V. 1995). Imazapyr is considered practically non-toxic to mammals and birds (Category IV, Table 1). Its toxicity to bees is believed to be similar to mammals. Risk to non-target plants may be slightly higher than other herbicides because of its soil activity. 

And from: Agricultural Chemistry Research And Extension, Dept of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology; Oregon State University; National Institute of Health Services, Environmental Health Sciences Center - Community Outreach Program, OSU-

For Comparative purposes, the EPA categorizes pesticides by their short term toxicity on a scale of 1 (most toxic) to 4 (least toxic). Most undiluted imazapyr formulations are Toxicity Category 4. "Imazapyr may be persistent in soils. Reported half-lives range from 14 days to 17 months. In forestry dissipation studies, reported values for the half life of Imazapyr range from 14 – 44 days in forest litter, 19 – 34 days in forest soils, and 12 – 40 days on plants.”

Water soluble, it is highly mobile in soils, and can travel through soil with water and enter groundwater. It can also move with runoff and enter surface water. Forestry uses should be evaluated for potential surface and groundwater contamination.”

The EPA advises, not to walk through freshly-sprayed vegetation. Do not eat berries or mushrooms, or other edibles, or drink the water from newly treated areas.”

 

PRACTICALLY NON-TOXIC

It’s water-soluble, and moves through soil to get into groundwater. “Traces of imazapyr were detected in the groundwater even 8 years after application,” according to a study by scientists from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (Pest Management Science, June 2004.) Full report is incorporated by reference.

"The long‐term fate of the herbicide imazapyr [2‐(4‐isopropyl‐4‐methyl‐5‐oxo‐2‐imidazolin‐2‐yl)nicotinic acid] applied to a Swedish railway embankment was studied. Imazapyr was applied at 750 and 1500 g ha−1 by a spraying train used for full‐scale herbicide treatment operations. Soil and groundwater were sampled twice a year for 8 years after application of the herbicide, and the dissipation of imazapyr was studied by HPLC analysis of the residues in soil and groundwater. A clean‐up procedure including solid‐phase extraction was performed prior to detection by HPLC. Recoveries of imazapyr from soil and water samples were 76–98% and 61–90%, respectively, and detection levels were 0.003 mg kg−1 and 0.05 µg litre−1, respectively. Sorption, desorption and microbial amount and activity were also measured at the two locations. The organic matter content correlated positively and the pH negatively to the adsorption of imazapyr on soil, and increasing organic matter contents decreased desorption. Apart from the 0–10‐cm top layers of both sites, the microbial amount and activity were small. The main proportion of imazapyr was found in the upper 30 cm of the soil, and degraded with a half‐life in the range 67–144 days."

"Small amounts were transported to lower soil layers and to the groundwater in proportion to the amounts applied. Traces of imazapyr were detected in the groundwater even 8 years after application. It was concluded that environmental risks from the use of herbicides on railway embankments could be reduced by including adsorption layers in the embankment during their construction and by reducing the dose of the herbicide used. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry - The Fate Of Imazapyr In A Swedish Railway Embankment - Source: Pest Management Science, Volume 60, Number 6, June 2004, pp. 544-549"

While the Swedish study is a broadcast spray scenario, that Imazapyr is pushed out through the roots into the soil is known and is relevant.

What is the environmental fate of the tree foods? Madrone berries, manzanita berries, oak acorns, this must be considered if herbicides are to be applied. The only other timeframe limitation is wet weather and spring (sap flows). The application of herbicides affects foraging for the NSO. With 11 NSO activity centers in the plan, has this concern been considered by MRC and CDFW?

In fact, some plants actually push it out, so it gets into the tangled roots below the soil and kills other plants. From the Nature Conservancy’s Weed Control Methods handbook: “… imazapyr may be actively exuded from the roots of legumes (such as mesquite), likely as a defense mechanism by those plants… the ability of imazapyr to move via intertwined root grafts may therefore adversely affect the surrounding desirable vegetation with little to no control of the target species.”

From: Agricultural Chemistry Research And Extension, Dept of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology; Oregon State University - National Institute of Health Services, Environmental Health Sciences Center - Community Outreach Program, OSU

For Comparative purposes, EPA categorizes pesticides by their short term toxicity on a scale of 1 (most toxic) to 4 (least toxic). Most undiluted imazapyr formulations are Toxicity Category 4.

May be persistent in soils. Reported half-lives range from 14 days to 17 months. In forestry dissipation studies, reported values for the half life of Imazapyr range from 14 – 44 days in forest litter, 19 – 34 days in forest soils, and 12 – 40 days on plants. Water soluble, it is highly mobile in soils, and can travel through soil with water and enter groundwater. It can also move with runoff and enter surface water. Forestry uses should be evaluated for potential surface and groundwater contamination.”

The half-life of imazapyr in water is about 4 days (SERA, 1999b). (JDSF 2005)

From: CalEPPC 2003, Imazapyr: CalEPPC 2003, Considerations for the Control of Invasive Plants - Imazapyr Wildlife Toxicity – Full report is incorporated by reference.

Stalker, Chopper, Arsenal, Habitat

? Quail 8 day diet LC 50 >5000ppm
? Duck 8 day diet LC 50 >5000ppm
? Honey bees LD 50 >100 Mg/bee
? Earth worm 14 day LC 50 >132.5ppm

Imazapyr - Environmental Fate

? Soil half life 25-142 days
? Microbial Degradation
? Water half life 2-3 days
? Soil mobility 12-18 inches vertically/no lateral movement

So we see that impacts to the food chain are inevitable. The chart above is from the EPA and represents toxicity tests where 50 percent died in control groups. That is the legally allowable toxicity level for use. That 50 percent includes a 10 percent natural mortality in control groups. If more than 50 percent die, the active ingredient is not allowed for use.

Mendocino Redwood Company needs to end herbicide use on it's ownership.

From the IMAZAPYR Specimen Label

STUMP AND CUT STEM TREATMENTS
Imazapyr will control undesirable woody vegetation in forest management when applied as a water solution to the cambium area of freshly-cut stump surfaces or to cuts on the stem of the target woody vegetation. Applications can be made at any time of the year except during periods of heavy sap flow in the spring. Tree injection and cut stem treatments are most effective in late summer and early fall. DO NOT over-apply to cause run-off or puddling of spray solution.

APPLICATION WITH DILUTE SOLUTIONS:
For cut stump treatments: Spray or brush the solution onto the cambium area of the freshly cut stump surface. Thoroughly wet the entire cambium area (the wood next to the bark of the stump).

For tree injection treatments: Using standard injection equipment, apply 1 milliliter of solution at each injection site around the tree with no more than one inch intervals between cut edges. Insure that the injector completely penetrates the bark at each injection site.

For frill or girdle treatments: Use a hatchet, machete or similar implement to make cuts
through the bark around the tree at intervals no more than two inches between cut edges.
Spray or brush mazapyr solution into each cut until thoroughly wet.

APPLICATION WITH CONCENTRATED SOLUTIONS:
For tree injection treatments: Using standard injection equipment, apply 1 milliliter of solution at each injection site. Make at least one injection cut for every three inches of Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) on the target tree. For example, a three inch DBH tree will receive 1 injection cut while a six inch DBH tree will receive 2 injection cuts. On trees requiring more than one injection site, place the injection cuts at approximately equal intervals around the tree.

For hack and squirt treatments: Use a hatchet, machete or similar implement to make cuts
at a downward angle completely through the bark and cambium at approximately equal intervals around the tree. Make at least one cut for every 3 inches of DBH on the target tree as described above, using a squirt bottle, syringe, or similar device apply about 1 milliliter of concentrate solution into each cut, ensuring that the solution does not run out of the cut.

It is a violation of Federal law to use this product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling.

Employ People, Not Poisons
Tomas DiFiore

Imazapyr: Banned or Regulated in Europe?

Imazapyr: Banned or Regulated in Europe?

(Ed note) While walking the Halfway to Hell's Gate THP near Comptche in Mendocino County with about 15 community members, the RPF stated (in an answer) that Imazapyr wasn't actually banned in Europe. And that got me to researching... and often, it seems, that there are those who are concerned about herbicide use, who excite a trend towards some perceived truth, but inaccuracy leaves any argument to fail in the moment.

And as to the use of Imazapyr, or a ban on it's use in Europe, the RPF is correct.

In 2003, the European Union (EU) took positive steps to regulate the safety of pesticides. Several hundred pesticide active ingredients were withdrawn from the European marketplace in accordance with Council Directive 91/41/EEC Directive. In addition, European Regulation No 304/2003, which implements the Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent (PIC Convention) requiring certain notifications for banned or severely restricted pesticides.

The active ingredients that were withdrawn from registration were to be phased out in Europe. These active ingredients may no longer be sold after 24 July 2003. Farmers and users had until 31 December 2003 to either use or dispose of stocks. An active ingredient can qualify as an essential use product, and may still be used for a limited purpose if “additional technical evidence has been provided demonstrating the essential need for further use of the active substance and the absence of an efficient alternative. It's use as such should be restricted to the control of harmful organisms for which no efficient alternatives exist.”

According to the European Union an essential use product may be used until 30 June 2007 provided that:
-it does not have any harmful effect on human or animal health and no unacceptable influence on the environment
-it is relabeled in order to match the restricted conditions
-Member States impose all appropriate risk mitigation measures to reduce any possible risks
-alternatives are being seriously sought

Many of the non-sponsored active ingredients are dangerous to both human health and the environment and will still be exported or sold in other areas of the world. Information regarding the hazards of these active ingredients should be shared with other countries so that they too may make informed decisions about registration.

The EU Directive 91/414 - The Directive regulates the registration, sale, and approval of plant protection products in the European Union. One of the key objectives is to review all active substances used in pesticides to determine the risk or harm to human health and the environment. 
Responsibility for conducting health and safety testing lies with the producer.
Currently 320 active ingredients are being withdrawn rather than being tested. The rationale for not sponsoring an active ingredient varies. Some of the actives are considered obsolete by the World Health Organization (WHO) – such as benodanil, carbophenothion, and prothiocarb. Others are no longer profitable for the manufacturers or are no longer registered in individual Member States. In addition, some of the active ingredients have known environmental or health effects that would preclude them from being re-registered, and therefore the manufacturers have decided it is not in their interest to conduct further testing but simply to withdraw the registrations.

Imazapyr

Defining a ban

The (Prior Informed Consent) PIC Convention defines a banned chemical as a chemical all uses of which, within one or more categories, have been prohibited by final regulatory action in order to protect human health or the environment. It includes a chemical that has been refused approval for first-time use or has been withdrawn by industry either from the domestic market or from further consideration in the domestic approval process and where there is clear evidence that such action has been taken in order to protect human health or the environment.

Regulation 304/2003 implementing the PIC Convention defines a banned chemical as a chemical that has been withdrawn by industry either from the Community market or from further consideration in a notification, registration, or approval process and where there is evidence that the chemical raises concerns for human health and the environment. This definition takes in many of the actives being withdrawn in 2003.
Even an active ingredient still permitted under the essential usage exemption may qualify for incorporation into the PIC Convention if it poses health or environmental problems. Under the Regulation 304/2003, an active ingredient restricted to an essential use falls within the definition of a severely restricted chemical:

A severely restricted chemical is a chemical that has, for virtually all uses, been ... withdrawn by industry either from the Community market or from further consideration in a notification, registration or approval process; and where there is evidence that the chemical raises concern for human health or the environment.

Substances Banned In The Eu Market

Pesticides with essential uses have not been given EU-wide approval. Certain countries have been given an extension (or derogation) for one or more essential uses for the active ingredient on specific crops. Member States are expected to explore alternatives to their use and to report on progress in substituting less harmful products or methods.

As shown on the page at the link above, a table presents pesticides banned or severely restricted in EU as a consequence of the application of Directive 79/117/EEC, Council Regulation 805/2004/EC and Directive 91/414/EEC (49 in total).

Directive 79/117/EEC can be regarded as the predecessor of Directive 91/414/EEC and concerns the prohibition of active substances which, even if applied in an appropriate manner could give rise to harmful effects. Council Regulation 850/2004/EC regards persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and implements the Stockholm Convention in EU.

Council Regulation 304/2003/EC concerns the export and import of dangerous chemicals and implements the Rotterdam Convention.

It provides for the notification to importers of any products banned under Directive 79/117/EEC or included in a Prior Informed Consent (PIC) list of the Rotterdam Convention.

The Regulation does not itself ban any chemicals, but with amending Directives (1212/2003 and 775/2004) reflects the regulatory status of chemicals under other EU legislation (79/117/EEC, 91/414/EEC, 850/2004/EEC or the Biocides Directive).

Essential Uses

Pesticides have been given a ‘derogation’ or exemption for what farmers and growers have convinced the regulators are essential uses. Each EU country has nominated specified pesticides (for example 14 for the UK) that will only be permitted for use on specified crops.

Imazapyr can be procured for essential use 835/04, 2076/2002.

To find out more visit The Pesticide Action Network (PAN) Pesticide Database - a one-stop location for toxicity and regulatory information for pesticides.

Here is a direct link to the EU partners data!

And the “List of Lists” which is a catalog of lists of pesticides identifying those associated with particularly harmful health or environmental impacts which can be downloaded free from the PAN UK website.

North America Pesticide Hazards Database

PAN North America’s on-line database is easy to use and contains a wealth of information on health and environmental impacts, from US EPA and other sources, and is searchable by active ingredient and product name.

And on a final note, updated to 2014, Imazapyr, Identification, toxicity, use, water pollution potential, ecological toxicity and regulatory information:

I don't personally see the need for use of herbicides in the Redwood Region. Older, larger trees, larger diameters, slower growth at older ages – the returns are larger volumes per acre.

Tan Oaks (which can live to be 800 years) are part of the nutrient rich feedstock for forest soils in the natural succession of re-colonization of the cut-over, burned landscape from which our rivers flow.

Employ People, Not Poisons.
Tomas DiFiore